I find ads which appear in youtube more intersting than their TV counterparts. Is novelty of the ad the reason? Or is it because ad creators know the chanchala mind of net users and hence put more effort into it.
I also should tell something about Kannada ads. If there is an ad in Hindi about product A, the same ad is literally translated into Kannada and is telecast. Which makes it dull and some times meaningless. Are these people well versed with our language or not? Take the example of "Swach bharat". In Hindi, Vidya Balan says to conclude "jahan soch, vahan shauchalay". And in Kannada ad, she says "elli alochaneyo alli shauchalaya". At least if she had used "manassu", it would have sounded better
Out of all the recent ads, the ones I liked are "She touched the pickle" because it tries to eliminate ignorance.
The ad I dislike very much is Tanishq, where Katrina says don't get married because your ex boyfriend is getting married or because you are lonely on valentine's day etc, etc. So a girl should not be married for trivial reasons, but she should be to getting wedding jewelry? Don't you think jewelry, no matter how expensive or glittery it is, is enough price for getting into life time of second class citizenship?
I also should tell something about Kannada ads. If there is an ad in Hindi about product A, the same ad is literally translated into Kannada and is telecast. Which makes it dull and some times meaningless. Are these people well versed with our language or not? Take the example of "Swach bharat". In Hindi, Vidya Balan says to conclude "jahan soch, vahan shauchalay". And in Kannada ad, she says "elli alochaneyo alli shauchalaya". At least if she had used "manassu", it would have sounded better
Out of all the recent ads, the ones I liked are "She touched the pickle" because it tries to eliminate ignorance.
The ad I dislike very much is Tanishq, where Katrina says don't get married because your ex boyfriend is getting married or because you are lonely on valentine's day etc, etc. So a girl should not be married for trivial reasons, but she should be to getting wedding jewelry? Don't you think jewelry, no matter how expensive or glittery it is, is enough price for getting into life time of second class citizenship?
Comments
Post a Comment