There was this article in TOI saying unlike Christianity, Hinduism does not advocate celibacy for spiritual leaders. The rishis in vedic period and people like Ramakrishna Paramahansa were married but still in spiritual path.
May be that is a valid point. But what is wrong is quoting this in the context of Asaram. Hindu rishis were married to one person, not acting like a sanyasi, and taking advantage of women who believe them to Gods. And certainly they would have been aghast at the very idea of abusing a fifteen year old.
Does the article justify Asaram's heinous crime.
I feel newspapers and other media should be careful about what they say and also what they imply.
May be that is a valid point. But what is wrong is quoting this in the context of Asaram. Hindu rishis were married to one person, not acting like a sanyasi, and taking advantage of women who believe them to Gods. And certainly they would have been aghast at the very idea of abusing a fifteen year old.
Does the article justify Asaram's heinous crime.
I feel newspapers and other media should be careful about what they say and also what they imply.
Comments
Post a Comment